Friday, December 11, 2009



By Eric Notti - AngelsWin.com Contributor


In the LA Times this morning this little tidbit prompted me thinking about an interesting scenario where the Angels could take advantage of the Dodgers dilemma.

Colletti said Thursday, "We're going to have some conversations, and we'll see if we can't do something," with agents for some of the young Dodgers. While Colletti wouldn't reveal the names, they are believed to be Loney, Broxton, Kemp and Andre Ethier.

Unable to afford Randy Wolf if he were to accept arbitration, the Dodgers gave up the chance at a first round draft pick when he departed. This leads me to believe Colletti is unable to extend payroll this year for any proven veterans to bolster the Dodgers pitching staff and are also under the gun to get all of their club control guys signed after arbitration.

The Dodgers have 9 players eligible for arbitration. George Sherril is in his 3rd year, Martin, Ethier, Repko, Broxton all in their 2nd year and Kemp, Loney, Billingsley and Kou all in their 1st year. They only have 5 players under contract for 2010 and their payroll is sitting at about $65.3 million. They are still saddled with 5 more years of paying for Andrew Jones $3.5 million a year for the time he spent with them. With the divorce and club ownership questions hanging over their heads, just how many of these young guys can they afford and still field a competitive team?

This is where the Angels come in to play. The Dodgers really need pitching in a bad way. The Angels have a couple of arms they can spare that are cheap. No, I'm not talking about Saunders or Weaver but of Palmer and Loux, both shown to be serviceable pitchers in the very hitter rich AL. So get out your trade calculators and think in terms of payroll relief for the Dodgers and outfield upgrades for the Angels.

Either would be a prime target in that he is a 2nd year arbitration candidate that put up a big year for the Dodgers and will be looking at a sizeable raise. He may be considered untouchable but then again he may be considered a payroll liability when you hear Colletti talking about having to try and make a deal with their agents. Plus side is he is a left handed power bat that can move into right field and shifts Abreu to the DH role, two problems solved.

The next target is Matt Kemp, a right handed hitter that can slide over and be the left fielder for the Angels. Nice power, very durable, young and a better glove than Rivera with more range. This moves Rivera to right field and Abreu to DH, again solving a couple issues.

Now the question is what package does the Dodgers the most good considering they are tied to both Juan Pierre and Manny Ramirez and lost their 2nd baseman to free agency. I would say a sign and trade of both Palmer and Izturis (returning a name to the Dodgers organization that fans may have missed) and possibly a low prospect for either Either or Kemp with salary relief, the Angels paying part of Palmer and Izturis' one year contracts.

Would it be possible? Considering the Dodgers are pitching poor, need a second baseman and are financially in bad shape, the Angels could present a package that sends the Angels a player, as good as or better than Bay that they could lock up with a multiyear contract without stripping their club of critical players. It also avoids being tied to another outfielder on the other side of 30. In return the Dodgers get an arm better than their farm system can produce a quality second baseman that they need badly and it actually gives them two leadoff type hitters in Izturis and Pierre to use next year.

Can the Angels even talk to Colletti about a deal being cross-town rivals? I'd sure like to see if they could. This would free up plenty of payroll room to re-sign John Lackey and it keeps the core of the rotation in place and doesn't sacrifice any more of the left side of the infield.
Love to hear what you think!

Tagged: , , , ,

1 comments:

Flailing Wildly said...

The two teams don't deal with each other very often, but I like the thought about making an offer on Kemp or Ethier. The Angels have a wealth of serviceable pitching, so I do think a deal is within the realm of possibility.

Copyright © 2013 Los Angeles Angels Blog | AngelsWin.com

AngelsWin.com is the unofficial website of the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim. Our comments and views do not express the views of the major league club or anyone affiliate with the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim.  AngelsWin.com blog content, articles and opinions are provided "as is" and without warranties of any kind.  We disclaim warranties, express or implied, including warranties for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, availability, security, compatibility and non-infringement.  Blog material, articles and other information furnished or supplied by you to AngelsWin.com become the ownership of AngelsWin.com for use at our discretion.  Your use of AngelsWin content is at your own discretion and risk. We do not warrant that any content here be error free that access thereto will be uninterrupted or errors will be corrected. We do not warrant or make any representations regarding  the use of any content made available through AngelsWin.com  You hereby waive any claim against us with respect thereto. AngelsWin.com may contain the opinions and views of other members and users. We cannot endorse, guarantee, or be responsible for the accuracy, efficacy or veracity of any content generated by our members and other users. The content of AngelsWin.com is intended for educational and entertainment purposes only. Such content is not intended to, and does not, constitute legal, professional, medical or healthcare advice or diagnosis, and may not be used for such purposes. Reliance on any information appearing on AngelsWin.com is strictly at your own risk. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in, or accessible through, the AngelsWin.com without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer or professional licensed in the recipient's state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.